SPSS
A single-user commercial statistics licence.
approx. $1,290/year
Per user, per year, localised to your region where we can detect it.
Figure shown for comparison only
SPSS alternative for clinical research
No licence, no syntax, and no seat to renew. Upload your dataset and StatsPlease chooses and computes the right test, builds your baseline-characteristics table, and drafts Methods and Results in journal style, ready to check and paste into your manuscript.
Every statistic is computed by our deterministic engine.
Built by a surgeon who knew research statistics shouldn’t require an SPSS licence to get right. Every test is chosen and computed by a fixed engine, the same way an analyst would do it by hand. The AI never computes a number.
Free during open access. No credit card.
Switching from SPSS
StatsPlease replaces the day-to-day reasons researchers reach for SPSS: choosing the right test, running it correctly, and writing it up in journal style.
Cost
IBM does not publish one flat global SPSS price, so the figure below is an estimate for comparison only. StatsPlease is free for every feature during open access.
A single-user commercial statistics licence.
approx. $1,290/year
Per user, per year, localised to your region where we can detect it.
Figure shown for comparison only
For one researcher, or a whole lab.
Free nowduring open access
No credit card. See the plans we’re preparing for later on pricing.
Start freeNo credit card
See it work
This is real output from the public Vanderbilt diabetes study, the same starter dataset every new account gets. The numbers are computed from the data; the wording is drafted for you to check and edit.
Results · Vanderbilt diabetes study (n = 390)
Stabilized serum glucose was strongly correlated with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), r = 0.75, P < .001: as glucose rose, so did HbA1c.
| Measure | HbA1c < 7% | HbA1c ≥ 7% | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| n | 330 | 60 | |
| Age, y | 44.7 (16.1) | 58.4 (13.1) | <.001 |
| Glucose, mg/dL | 91.6 (26.9) | 194.2 (77.4) | <.001 |
Mean (SD). Mann-Whitney U; groups split at the clinical HbA1c cutoff of 7.0%.
And a null result, reported the same way
HbA1c did not differ between men and women (median 4.90 vs 4.79%; P = .225). Not every comparison is significant, and StatsPlease says so.
How it compares
The tool you already know, and the two other places researchers land when they’re deciding what replaces it.
| Capability | SPSS | R | ChatGPT & other LLMs | StatsPlease |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Numbers you can independently check | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ |
| Correct test selected automatically | ✗ | ✗ | ⚠ | ✓ |
| Drafts Methods & Results for you | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| No licence, syntax, or stats knowledge needed | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Publication-ready output | ✗ | ✗ | ⚠ | ✓ |
| Reproducible in SPSS | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ |
ChatGPT and other LLMs can produce statistics that read plausibly but cannot be independently checked or reproduced.
Free during open access. No credit card.
Reproducibility
Each result below is a real analysis StatsPlease ran on a published clinical dataset. The test, the numbers, and the data are all here. Download any one, run it in SPSS, and check every value. Some results are strong and some are small, exactly as the data is.
Pearson correlation
Vanderbilt diabetes study · n = 390
Stabilized glucose and HbA1c were strongly correlated; r = 0.75; P < .001.
Both measures continuous and approximately linear, so Pearson's correlation.
Download the data (CSV)Mann-Whitney U
Heart-failure cohort · n = 299
Serum creatinine was higher in patients who died than in survivors (median 1.30 vs 1.00 mg/dL); U = 14190; P < .001; r = 0.46.
Creatinine was non-normal with unequal variances, so Mann-Whitney U.
Download the data (CSV)Mann-Whitney U
Melanoma survival study · n = 205
Tumour thickness was greater in ulcerated melanomas (median 3.54 vs 1.29 mm); U = 8520; P < .001; r = 0.65.
Thickness was non-normal in both groups, so Mann-Whitney U.
Download the data (CSV)Questions
For the everyday analyses of clinical and epidemiological research, yes: group comparisons, correlations, regression, and categorical tests, in parametric and nonparametric forms, plus the write-up. It is not built for survival analysis, longitudinal mixed models, complex survey designs, or Bayesian methods; for those, a biostatistician remains the right choice.
No. Upload a CSV or Excel file and StatsPlease reads your columns, checks assumptions, and chooses the test for you. There is no syntax window and nothing to install.
Yes. StatsPlease imports SPSS (.sav) files directly, alongside REDCap, CSV, and Excel, so switching over does not mean re-entering your data.
The numbers are computed. Every test statistic, p-value, effect size, and confidence interval is calculated directly from your data through a fixed, transparent decision tree, the same way an analyst would compute them by hand. They are not generated by ChatGPT or another large language model, so they reproduce exactly and hold up in review. The Methods and Results wording around those numbers is drafted for you in journal style, then yours to check and edit.
Yes. Every test statistic, p-value, effect size, and confidence interval is computed directly from your data through a fixed, transparent decision tree, so a rerun in SPSS should land on the same numbers. The validation page has worked examples on real datasets, with the data available to download and check yourself.
Yes. StatsPlease is in open access and every feature is currently free, with no credit card required.
Free during open access. No credit card.
The SPSS alternative for clinical research.
Start free